506 before the trial court docket, which once more dismissed AO petition for evaluation. In reviewing the trial courtroom’s decision, the Superior Court discovered that the trial court docket committed a number of errors of law. This court found that AO provided adequate proof to show prima facie circumstances of neglect, cruelty, and aggravated cruelty with respect to the incidents. The courtroom then analyzed whether the report supported a protection of “normal agricultural operations” protection that might counter the charges. This court found that incidents like the dehorning of cattle that already had horns fused to the cranium and excessive tail twisting and surprising have been sufficient to overcome the affirmative protection. The trial courtroom’s dismissal of AO’s petition for evaluate was reversed and the trial court was ordered to direct the DA to merely accept and transmit charges for prosecution.
You can addContent the file instantly from your WordPress …